This post has been imported from my previous blog. I did my best to parse XML properly, but it might have some errors.
If you find one, send a Pull Request.
Do you call a few services in a row as a part of a bigger process? What if one of the calls fails? What if your hosting application fails? Do you provide a reliable way for successfully finishing your process? If not, I might have a solution for you.
A process can be defined as at least two calls to different services. When using a client library of some sort and C# async-await feature one could write a following process
var id = await invoiceService.IssueInvoice(invoiceData);
It’s easy and straightforward. First, we want to issue an invoice. Once it’s done, a notification should be sent. Both calls although they are async should be executed step by step. Now. What if the process is halted after issuing the invoice? When we rerun it, there’s no notion of something stopped in the middle. One could hope for good logging, but what if this fails as well.
Here comes the solution provided by DurableTask library provided by the Azure team. The library provides a capability of recording all the responses and replaying them without execution. All you need is to create proxies to the services using a special orchestration context.
With a process like the above when executing following state is captured:
invoiceData are stored when first call is done
invoiceService returns and the response is recorded as well
invoiceNumber is stored as a parameter to the second call
Interested in async await, concurrency and you want to expand your knowledge?
Check out Async Expert! Together with Dotnetos I prepared something special for you!
As you can see, every execution is stored and is followed by storing it’s result. OK. But what does it mean if my process fails?
What happens when failure occurs. Let’s consider some of the possibilities.
If an error occurs between 1 and 2, process can be restarted with the same parameters. Nothing really happened.
If an error occurs between 2 and 3, process is restarted. The parameters to the call were stored but there’s no notion of the call to the first service. It’s called again (yes, the delivery guarantee is at-least-once).
If an error occurs between 3 and 4, process is restarted. The response to the call to the invoice service is restored from the state (there’s no real call made). The parameters are established on the basis of previous values.
And so on and so forth.
Because the whole process is based either on the input data or already received calls’ results it’s fully deterministic. It can be safely replayed when needed. What are not deterministic calls that you might need? DateTime.Now comes immediately to one’s mind. You can address it by using deterministic time provided by the context.CurrentUtcDateTime.
You can build a truly powerful and reliable processes on top of it. Currently, implementation that is provides is based on Azure Storage and Azure Service Bus. In a branch you can find an implementation for Service Fabric, which enables you to use it in your cluster run on your development machine, on premises or in the cloud.
Ensuring that a process can be run till a successful end isn’t an easy task. It’s good to see a library that uses a well known and stable language construct of async-await and lifts it to the next level, making it an important tool for writing resilient orchestrations.
Thanks for this, very interesting project!by applicita at 2017-04-21 11:57:34 +0000